• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Waterstone Insolvency

Waterstone Insolvency

Corporate Insolvency & Recovery Specialists

MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Team
    • What We Believe
    • In-House Model
  • Services
    • Liquidations
    • Receiverships
    • Voluntary Administration
    • Part XIV Compromise
  • Our Work
    • Case Studies
    • Our Judgments
  • Videos
  • Resources
        • News

          • Waterline Newsletter
          • Articles
          • Videos
          • Insolvency Statistics
        • eBooks

          • Debt Hibernation
          • Insolvency 101
          • Directors Risks
          • Voidable Transactions
        • Other

          • Forms
          • Technical Terms
          • Solvency Test
  • Contact Us
    • Book an appointment
0800CLOSED
0800CLOSED

CASE STUDY – HIGHBROOK CONSTRUCTION*

By Michael Turner - Updated on April 14, 2022

Background – Construction industry and receiverships of construction companies

The receivership of construction companies is notoriously difficult, due in part to the model in which most construction companies operate.

Simplified, under the Construction Contracts Act (2002) a construction company will issue a payment claim to their customer detailing how much work they believe they have carried out for the relevant period (often monthly) the customer of the Company will then assess the work carried out and issue a payment schedule in response outlining their position on what work they believe has been carried out.

Construction companies will often issue payment claims monthly and have their subcontractors invoice them monthly.

When dealing with the receivership of a construction company, it is often the case where the customer of the construction company will refuse to pay the construction company’s last month of payment claims.

The rationale behind this varies on a case-by-case basis but ranges from legitimate disputes which may have occurred prior to receivership to overclaiming by the construction Company or poor performance.

We have also seen examples where Customers may issue payment schedules with a $0.00 balance, citing setoffs (which are often yet to be quantified) caused due to the receivership of the Construction Company.

If not managed properly, this can lead to a situation where the Company has one month (or more of creditors) with no clear receivables to collect.

When dealing with the receivership of an insolvent construction company it is essential to deal with outstanding payment claims immediately, working with the customers to facilitate the handover of the contract and maximise the value of the payment claims received for the benefit of creditors.

Our client had factored in construction debts of Highbrook Construction which were subsequently heavily disputed.

The customer of Highbrook Construction was claiming numerous setoffs and damages associated with the Company’s poor performance of construction contracts.

Upon appointment, we reviewed documentation from the Company, and the customer of the Company and met with the customer of the Company to discuss the outstanding debt.

Result

The result of this was a legal settlement with the customer and Highbrook Construction which resulted in a payment to our appointor for approximately 75% of their core debt, and the conclusion of the receivership within 7 days.

*Name changed

Filed Under: Case Studies

Michael Turner, Insolvency Officer
[email protected]

GET IN TOUCH WITH WATERSTONE

We offer free 30 minute, no obligation appointments

BOOK NOW

Footer

Quick Links

  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Services
  • Resources
  • Contact Us
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Postal Address

PO Box 352
Shortland Street
Auckland 1140
0800CLOSED

Free Newsletter

Free Newsletter

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Main Office

16 Piermark Dr
Rosedale
Auckland 0632

Wellington Office

Brandon House
Level 3, 149 Featherston Street
Wellington 6011

Copyright © 2023 Waterstone Insolvency · Website by Acronym